Unit value of hospital admissions: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  purpose of the assessment(s) that the variable belongs to.
  purpose of the assessment(s) that the variable belongs to.


Unit cost for hospital-based health care involving hospitalisation. Included in the total unit cost are 1) resource costs i.e. medical costs paid by the health service or covered by an insurance and any other out-of-pocket expenses paid by the person/family, 2) opportunity costs i.e. cost in terms of lost productivity, and 3) disutility i.e. other social and economic costs including restrictions on or reduced enjoyment of leisure activities and discomfort or inconvenience to family members or others.
Unit cost for health care involving hospitalisation. Included in the total unit cost are 1) resource costs i.e. medical costs paid by the health service or covered by an insurance and any other out-of-pocket expenses paid by the person/family, 2) opportunity costs i.e. cost in terms of lost productivity, and 3) disutility i.e. other social and economic costs including restrictions on or reduced enjoyment of leisure activities and discomfort or inconvenience to family members or others.


'''Dimensions and boundaries relevant for the variable
'''Dimensions and boundaries relevant for the variable
*Country
*Country
*Cause of hospitalisation
*Cause of hospitalisation


== Definition ==
== Definition ==
Line 28: Line 28:
'''ExternE 2005<ref>[http://www.externe.info/brussels/methup05a.pdf European Commission 2005. ExternE, Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update. Bickel P & Friedrich R (Eds.)]</ref>
'''ExternE 2005<ref>[http://www.externe.info/brussels/methup05a.pdf European Commission 2005. ExternE, Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update. Bickel P & Friedrich R (Eds.)]</ref>


Generic unit hospital health care cost for hospitalisation (year 2000 prices). Based on data from Netten & Curtis (2000)<ref>Netten A & Curtisl L (2000). Unit costs of Health and Social Care 2000. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)</ref>, Ready et al. (2004)<ref>Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R., Machado F., Mourato S, Spanninks F & Rodriguez MXV (2004). Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers Across Countries? Environmental & Resource Economics, 29: 67-82</ref>
''Resource cost
 
Generic unit resource cost for hospitalisation (year 2000 prices). Based on data from Netten & Curtis (2000)<ref>Netten A & Curtisl L (2000). Unit costs of Health and Social Care 2000. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)</ref>, Ready et al. (2004)<ref>Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R., Machado F., Mourato S, Spanninks F & Rodriguez MXV (2004). Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers Across Countries? Environmental & Resource Economics, 29: 67-82</ref>


{|{{prettytable}}
{|{{prettytable}}
Line 58: Line 60:
| 323
| 323
|}
|}
''Opportunity cost
*Direct cost (salary cost of absent individual, replacement cost, lost service or production time)
**Mean: 114 €/employee-day absence
**Median: 85 €/employee-day absence (recommended central estimate)
*Indirect cost (lower customer satisfaction, poorer quality of products or services leading to a loss of future business): 168 €/emloyee-day absence
**There is less confidence in this value due to low survey response rate. Representativeness not fully established.
*Based on CBI (1998)<ref>CBI (1998). Missing Out: 1998 Absence and Labour turnover Survey, London: Confederation of British Industry (CBI).</ref>
A crude alternative to the figures presented above is to use information from EUROSTAT Statistical Yearbook on mean annual gross earnings paid to EU employees and divide this by the size of labour force to give mean annual productivity. This gives a value of €56. However, the estimate does not include all costs (direct or indirect), and is therefore recommended to be used as a lower boundary estimate.
Country-specific estimates of direct and indirect costs are can be derived by scaling EUROSTAT country data to EUROSTAT data for UK, and to apply this scaling factor to the values derived from CBI study. If this data is not available, country purchasing power parity relative to UK can be used.
*Mean total cost estimates (including direct and indirect costs) for EU
**lower bound €58
**Central estimate €88
**upper bound €261
''Disutility
*Mean: 468 €/occurrence
*Based on Ready et al. (2004), who estimated willingness-to-pay (WTP) for respiratory hospital admissions in a survey-based approach (contingent valuation method).
''Total unit cost per hospital admission
*Price year 2003: 2141 €/hospital admission from respiratory distress
**resource cost for 3 days
**Productivity loss for 8 days
**disutility cost


'''''THL/STAKES
'''''THL/STAKES
*[http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tyopaperit/T3-2008-VERKKO.pdf Unit costs for health care in Finland 2006 (in finnish)]<ref>[http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tyopaperit/T3-2008-VERKKO.pdf Hujanen T, Kapiainen S, Tuominen U & Pekurinen M (2008). Terveydenhuollon yksikkökustannukset Suomessa 2006. Stakesin työpapereita 3/2008. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tutkimus- ja kehittämiskeskus.]</ref>
*[http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tyopaperit/T3-2008-VERKKO.pdf Unit resource costs for health care in Finland 2006 (in finnish)]<ref>[http://www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/tyopaperit/T3-2008-VERKKO.pdf Hujanen T, Kapiainen S, Tuominen U & Pekurinen M (2008). Terveydenhuollon yksikkökustannukset Suomessa 2006. Stakesin työpapereita 3/2008. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tutkimus- ja kehittämiskeskus.]</ref>
*Unit costs for inpatient health care
*Unit costs for inpatient health care
**Average for somatic medicine
**Average for somatic medicine
Line 82: Line 115:
  Unit in which the result is expressed.
  Unit in which the result is expressed.


euro/inpatient day
euro/admission


=== Formula ===
=== Formula ===
Line 92: Line 125:


  If possible, a numerical expression or distribution.
  If possible, a numerical expression or distribution.
2414


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 07:58, 7 August 2009

Boxes with dashed borders contain brief guidance text for completing the entries for new variables.

Scope

This includes a verbal definition of the spatial, temporal, and other limits
(system boundaries) of the variable. The scope is defined according to the use
purpose of the assessment(s) that the variable belongs to.

Unit cost for health care involving hospitalisation. Included in the total unit cost are 1) resource costs i.e. medical costs paid by the health service or covered by an insurance and any other out-of-pocket expenses paid by the person/family, 2) opportunity costs i.e. cost in terms of lost productivity, and 3) disutility i.e. other social and economic costs including restrictions on or reduced enjoyment of leisure activities and discomfort or inconvenience to family members or others.

Dimensions and boundaries relevant for the variable

  • Country
  • Cause of hospitalisation

Definition

Data

Description of the data used for obtaining the value of the variable
(e.g. measurement data; mathematical method and its parameters).
Please include references (preferably using the <ref></ref> tags)
and links to original data, as appropriate.

ExternE 2005[1]

Resource cost

Generic unit resource cost for hospitalisation (year 2000 prices). Based on data from Netten & Curtis (2000)[2], Ready et al. (2004)[3]

Country €/inpatient day
Belgium 241
France 375
Germany 321
Italy 256
Netherlands 390
Spain 345
UK 330
Mean (EU) 323

Opportunity cost

  • Direct cost (salary cost of absent individual, replacement cost, lost service or production time)
    • Mean: 114 €/employee-day absence
    • Median: 85 €/employee-day absence (recommended central estimate)
  • Indirect cost (lower customer satisfaction, poorer quality of products or services leading to a loss of future business): 168 €/emloyee-day absence
    • There is less confidence in this value due to low survey response rate. Representativeness not fully established.
  • Based on CBI (1998)[4]

A crude alternative to the figures presented above is to use information from EUROSTAT Statistical Yearbook on mean annual gross earnings paid to EU employees and divide this by the size of labour force to give mean annual productivity. This gives a value of €56. However, the estimate does not include all costs (direct or indirect), and is therefore recommended to be used as a lower boundary estimate.

Country-specific estimates of direct and indirect costs are can be derived by scaling EUROSTAT country data to EUROSTAT data for UK, and to apply this scaling factor to the values derived from CBI study. If this data is not available, country purchasing power parity relative to UK can be used.

  • Mean total cost estimates (including direct and indirect costs) for EU
    • lower bound €58
    • Central estimate €88
    • upper bound €261

Disutility

  • Mean: 468 €/occurrence
  • Based on Ready et al. (2004), who estimated willingness-to-pay (WTP) for respiratory hospital admissions in a survey-based approach (contingent valuation method).

Total unit cost per hospital admission

  • Price year 2003: 2141 €/hospital admission from respiratory distress
    • resource cost for 3 days
    • Productivity loss for 8 days
    • disutility cost


THL/STAKES

  • Unit resource costs for health care in Finland 2006 (in finnish)[5]
  • Unit costs for inpatient health care
    • Average for somatic medicine
      • 2713 €/hospitalisation period
      • 3.8 days/hospitalisation period
    • Internal medicine
      • 2818 €/hospitalisation period
      • 4.9 days/hospitalisation period
    • Pulmonary medicine
      • 2380 €/hospitalisation period
      • 4.8 days/hospitalisation period

Causality

List of upstream variables.
The variables can be listed used descriptive (free-format) names or unambiguous identifiers
(e.g. Analytica IDs).

Unit

Unit in which the result is expressed.

euro/admission

Formula

Algebra or other explicit methods if possible
(e.g. Analytica code between the ''<anacode></anacode>'' delimiters).

Result

If possible, a numerical expression or distribution.

2414

See also

Links to relevant information that does not belong to Definition.

References

Will appear here automatically, if cited above using the <ref></ref> tags.
Additional references can also be listed here.
  1. European Commission 2005. ExternE, Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update. Bickel P & Friedrich R (Eds.)
  2. Netten A & Curtisl L (2000). Unit costs of Health and Social Care 2000. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)
  3. Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R., Machado F., Mourato S, Spanninks F & Rodriguez MXV (2004). Benefit Transfer in Europe: How Reliable Are Transfers Across Countries? Environmental & Resource Economics, 29: 67-82
  4. CBI (1998). Missing Out: 1998 Absence and Labour turnover Survey, London: Confederation of British Industry (CBI).
  5. Hujanen T, Kapiainen S, Tuominen U & Pekurinen M (2008). Terveydenhuollon yksikkökustannukset Suomessa 2006. Stakesin työpapereita 3/2008. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tutkimus- ja kehittämiskeskus.