Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    149 bytes (16 words) - 07:31, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    165 bytes (19 words) - 07:31, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    156 bytes (17 words) - 07:31, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    161 bytes (18 words) - 07:32, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    150 bytes (16 words) - 07:32, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    153 bytes (17 words) - 07:32, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    158 bytes (18 words) - 07:32, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    147 bytes (16 words) - 07:32, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    154 bytes (16 words) - 07:33, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    151 bytes (16 words) - 07:33, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    171 bytes (19 words) - 07:33, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    160 bytes (18 words) - 07:33, 4 August 2016
  • {{study|moderator=Pauli}}
    152 bytes (17 words) - 07:34, 4 August 2016
  • * Jouni Tuomisto; John Evans; Arja Asikainen; Pauli Ordén. 2016. Discussion rules as a method to resolve scientific disputes.
    55 KB (8,021 words) - 13:01, 23 August 2017

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)