Difference between revisions of "Open Task Group on Climate Change"

From Opasnet
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also: Stubb: Green economy as EU big goal)
(principles added)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Energy]]
 
[[Category:Energy]]
 
[[Category:Activities]]
 
[[Category:Activities]]
{{assessment}}
+
{{method|moderator=Jouni}}
 +
 
 +
'''Open Task Group on Climate Change''' is an activity group of researchers, politicians, and stakeholders based on voluntary work. The Task Group aims to develop an agreement for global climate actions for the next ten years.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
;Slogan: Policy-making is too important to be left to politicians only.
  
 
==Scope==
 
==Scope==
  
Critical questions:
+
What is Open Task Group on Climate Change? How is it organised? What are its main objectives? What are its main activities?
* Should the CC framework be based on carbon trade, carbon tax, a hybrid with both, or something else?
+
What are the critical questions that it tries to address?
* How should the future impacts be discounted?
 
* Is the target to stay below +2 C ambitious and safe enough?
 
* What is the detailed framework (ETS or similar) that leads to achieving the +2 C target?
 
* What are the detailed practical actions needed for achieving the +2 C target?
 
* What are the different things that each country is willing to accept/promote and which not? Why?
 
* What are the decision options available at different levels? Who are the decision-makers?
 
 
  
What is the big goal? What does it look like?
+
The answers to the questions below should be based on the following criteria:
* It must be easily undesrtandable.
+
* The Task Group is open to anyone who accepts its rules.
* It must be short (one sentence).
+
* The Task Group aims to promote any solutions and actions that are scientifically defendable. If science does not rule out one of two options, the Task Group promotes both.
* It must be motivating.
+
* Therefore, the focus of the work is not to promote a specific policy but to attack policies that are not scientifically founded.
* It must show guidance to an individual actor (s/he must be able to see the own role in it.)
+
* Scientific criticism is the ultimate criterion for conclusions.
 +
* [[Open assessment]] is used to operationalise the work of the Task Group.
  
 
===Intended users===
 
===Intended users===
  
*Politicians in the Copenhagen [[COP-15]] meeting in December, 2009.
+
* Politicians in the Mexico City [[COP-16]] meeting in 2010.
 +
* Citizens of the world.
  
 
===Participants===
 
===Participants===
  
 
This is an [[open assessment]]. Anyone can participate. Especially, we hope participation from the following groups:
 
This is an [[open assessment]]. Anyone can participate. Especially, we hope participation from the following groups:
* The Finnish Government
+
* [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Open_Task_Group_on_Climate_Change&oldid=14065 Previous ideas about potential participants]
* The Finnish Parliament
 
* The participants of the [[COP-15]] meeting
 
 
 
  
 
'''Registered participants
 
'''Registered participants
  
 
If you want to join the Task Group, you can simply create a user account in Opasnet and add your name in the list:
 
If you want to join the Task Group, you can simply create a user account in Opasnet and add your name in the list:
* --[[User:Jouni|Jouni]]
+
* [[User:Jouni|Jouni]]
 
 
==Definition==
 
 
 
Listen to different countries. China, India, Brasil, and many others should be involved and listened to.
 
 
 
Practicalities about other commitments: What else should be done before December 2009?
 
* Finish Beneris
 
* Intarese risk characterisation and Mega case study.
 
* EracEdu
 
* Claih
 
* Bioher
 
 
 
Can we use the THL name in this work (Juha, Pekka)?
 
 
 
Open Research Society: Do you take the leadership to publish the Journal of Open Assessment?
 
  
A manuscript should be sent to Nature/Science: Science-Policy interface helps policy-making use the scientific information. This should be published before summer.
+
==Rationale==
 
 
People and institutes to get involved:
 
* Alistair and Vaclav (economics)
 
* Intarese
 
* Heimsta
 
* 2-Fun
 
* Beneris?
 
* Claih
 
* Bioher
 
* Tapas
 
* SRA-E
 
* Red Cross
 
* Modellers and people that are able to create and run models in this project.
 
* Analytica should be used= Lumina
 
* People that know local people and politicians: contact points
 
* Scouts?
 
* Lobbyists
 
* Translators: people who are able to translate things from one wiki to another. At least Chinese, Arabic, Spanish, English, Portuguese, Russian.
 
* Wikipedists around the world
 
* Wikimedia Foundation: This must become a wiki project
 
* US Government
 
* Global Energy Assessment
 
* Global Burden of Disease
 
* IIASA
 
* SYKE
 
* Ministry of Environment
 
* Potsdam
 
* Tyndall
 
* Ethics experts (Timo Airaksinen)
 
* Keynote speakers of ClimateCongress
 
* A large group of volunteeds needed.
 
 
 
Methods to spread the word.
 
* Send chain letters about specific issues, so that people who know about that can send it forward to those who know about the topic or can work on it.
 
* Develop a hierarchical system for information flow so that key topics have responsible people who follow it and report upwards in the project management chain.
 
 
  
 
Review and collect the key models, and make them available for further use. This should also include standardisation, if possible.
 
Review and collect the key models, and make them available for further use. This should also include standardisation, if possible.
Line 107: Line 53:
 
* Opasnet Base
 
* Opasnet Base
 
   
 
   
 
Principles
 
* The project team does not pay salaries to anyone. Everyone works either for their employer or on a voluntary basis.
 
* [[Open assessment]] method is the ultimate criterion.
 
* Go for the truth. You don't need a permission from anyone.
 
* Go beyond your own role. Be bold.
 
  
 
How are the tasks identified and delegated? What does the project team do, and what is done by others? Who are the members of the project team? Who is the leader?
 
How are the tasks identified and delegated? What does the project team do, and what is done by others? Who are the members of the project team? Who is the leader?
  
 +
==Result==
  
Things to do:
+
The main task of the Task Group is to develop the [[Citizens' climate treaty]], an action plan for global mitigation of climate change. It aims to replace the Copenhagen climate treaty that failed in the Copenhagen [[COP-15]] meeting in December 2009.
* A 2D table country*opinion on options
 
* A hierarchical description of value structures.
 
* We must get to participate in the official negotiation process.
 
* Write instructions for participating.
 
  
Places where idea/results are presented:
+
Building an international treaty is a huge task. It must have clear a code of conduct to be successful. Also, the process must be such that it cannot be halted by a few individuals or groups, even if they are powerful. The work will be done along these '''principles''':
* SRA-E
+
* The whole treaty has a large number of items. Each item will be handled and written on a separate page in [[Opasnet]]. This way, they can be worked on simultaneously by different people.
* SRA US
+
* A new item can be opened if it has a clear scope and purpose. The general purpose of all items is to describe some practical [[task]]s that the participants of the treaty will have to do after the treaty has been accepted.
 +
* It must be possible to evaluate the quality and [[performance]] of the content of an item against its [[purpose]]. The evaluation is continuous and guides the development of the content.
 +
* The suggested piece of treaty text about each item is called the [[result]] of the item.
 +
* A suggested piece of text can be removed from the result. This can be done by showing either a) that if the suggested task are done by the treaty participants, the outcome does not fulfil the performance criteria, or b) that the treaty participants are unlikely to do the task described.
 +
* If a suggested result fulfils the performance criteria, it is called and acceptable result, and it cannot be removed. Thus, it is possible to have several results at the same time. These results may even be contradictory to each other.
 +
* It is the [[result]] that is evaluated against the [[purpose]]. In addition, the item page may contain [[rationale]] including [[discussion]] about what the result should contain. Thus, each page has three main parts: [[purpose]], [[rationale]], and [[result]].
 +
* If two items are independent, they are developed independently. If they depend on each other, this dependency must be explicated under the subheading [[dependency|dependencies]] in [[rationale]]. An item that affects another is called a parent, and the item that is affected is called a child.
 +
* The dependency is taken into account in such a way that the result of the child must fulfil the performance criteria ''conditional on'' the result(s) of the parent(s). It is possible that a result of a child is only acceptable with a particular result of a parent but not with other results of the parent.
 +
* The project works on voluntary basis. Everyone works either for their employers or on their free time.
 +
* [[Open assessment]] method is the ultimate criterion.
 +
* Go for the truth. You don't need a permission from anyone.
 +
* Go beyond your own role. Be bold.
  
What about other actions than emission reductions?
 
* Albedo manipulation
 
* SO2 in the stratosphere
 
* Space mirrors
 
  
Policy-making is too important to be left to politicians only.
+
;Methods to spread the word:
 
+
* Send chain letters about specific issues, so that people who know about that can send it forward to those who know about the topic or can work on it.
==Result==
+
* Develop a hierarchical system for information flow so that key topics have responsible people who follow it and report upwards in the project management chain.
 +
* Identify groups, organisations, and individuals who were involved in the Copenhagen process. They are likely interested in getting a treaty, after all.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 141: Line 86:
 
* [[:op_fi:Kutsu: Iskuryhmä ilmastonmuutosta vastaan|Kutsu: Iskuryhmä ilmastonmuutosta vastaan]]
 
* [[:op_fi:Kutsu: Iskuryhmä ilmastonmuutosta vastaan|Kutsu: Iskuryhmä ilmastonmuutosta vastaan]]
 
* [http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/ulkomaat/ulkoministeri-alexander-stubb-eu-tarvitsee-uuden-ison-projektin Foreign minister Alexander Stubb (Fi): EU needs a new big project]. It could be green, sustainable economy.
 
* [http://suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/ulkomaat/ulkoministeri-alexander-stubb-eu-tarvitsee-uuden-ison-projektin Foreign minister Alexander Stubb (Fi): EU needs a new big project]. It could be green, sustainable economy.
 +
* [[Citizens' climate treaty]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Latest revision as of 06:27, 21 December 2009



Open Task Group on Climate Change is an activity group of researchers, politicians, and stakeholders based on voluntary work. The Task Group aims to develop an agreement for global climate actions for the next ten years.


Slogan
Policy-making is too important to be left to politicians only.

Scope

What is Open Task Group on Climate Change? How is it organised? What are its main objectives? What are its main activities? What are the critical questions that it tries to address?

The answers to the questions below should be based on the following criteria:

  • The Task Group is open to anyone who accepts its rules.
  • The Task Group aims to promote any solutions and actions that are scientifically defendable. If science does not rule out one of two options, the Task Group promotes both.
  • Therefore, the focus of the work is not to promote a specific policy but to attack policies that are not scientifically founded.
  • Scientific criticism is the ultimate criterion for conclusions.
  • Open assessment is used to operationalise the work of the Task Group.

Intended users

  • Politicians in the Mexico City COP-16 meeting in 2010.
  • Citizens of the world.

Participants

This is an open assessment. Anyone can participate. Especially, we hope participation from the following groups:

Registered participants

If you want to join the Task Group, you can simply create a user account in Opasnet and add your name in the list:

Rationale

Review and collect the key models, and make them available for further use. This should also include standardisation, if possible.

  • Climate models
  • Dispersion models
  • Economic models
  • Policy models
  • Regional and city-level models
  • Health models
  • Land use models
  • Legal models
  • Bayesian belief nets


Give training to key people in the project team (involve people that are not in the risk group)

  • Opasnet Base


How are the tasks identified and delegated? What does the project team do, and what is done by others? Who are the members of the project team? Who is the leader?

Result

The main task of the Task Group is to develop the Citizens' climate treaty, an action plan for global mitigation of climate change. It aims to replace the Copenhagen climate treaty that failed in the Copenhagen COP-15 meeting in December 2009.

Building an international treaty is a huge task. It must have clear a code of conduct to be successful. Also, the process must be such that it cannot be halted by a few individuals or groups, even if they are powerful. The work will be done along these principles:

  • The whole treaty has a large number of items. Each item will be handled and written on a separate page in Opasnet. This way, they can be worked on simultaneously by different people.
  • A new item can be opened if it has a clear scope and purpose. The general purpose of all items is to describe some practical tasks that the participants of the treaty will have to do after the treaty has been accepted.
  • It must be possible to evaluate the quality and performance of the content of an item against its purpose. The evaluation is continuous and guides the development of the content.
  • The suggested piece of treaty text about each item is called the result of the item.
  • A suggested piece of text can be removed from the result. This can be done by showing either a) that if the suggested task are done by the treaty participants, the outcome does not fulfil the performance criteria, or b) that the treaty participants are unlikely to do the task described.
  • If a suggested result fulfils the performance criteria, it is called and acceptable result, and it cannot be removed. Thus, it is possible to have several results at the same time. These results may even be contradictory to each other.
  • It is the result that is evaluated against the purpose. In addition, the item page may contain rationale including discussion about what the result should contain. Thus, each page has three main parts: purpose, rationale, and result.
  • If two items are independent, they are developed independently. If they depend on each other, this dependency must be explicated under the subheading dependencies in rationale. An item that affects another is called a parent, and the item that is affected is called a child.
  • The dependency is taken into account in such a way that the result of the child must fulfil the performance criteria conditional on the result(s) of the parent(s). It is possible that a result of a child is only acceptable with a particular result of a parent but not with other results of the parent.
  • The project works on voluntary basis. Everyone works either for their employers or on their free time.
  • Open assessment method is the ultimate criterion.
  • Go for the truth. You don't need a permission from anyone.
  • Go beyond your own role. Be bold.


Methods to spread the word
  • Send chain letters about specific issues, so that people who know about that can send it forward to those who know about the topic or can work on it.
  • Develop a hierarchical system for information flow so that key topics have responsible people who follow it and report upwards in the project management chain.
  • Identify groups, organisations, and individuals who were involved in the Copenhagen process. They are likely interested in getting a treaty, after all.

See also

References