Difference between revisions of "Health effects of waste management"

From Opasnet
Jump to: navigation, search
(link to IEAHIAS added)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{assessment}}
+
[[Category:IEHIAS]]
:''This case study was carried out as part (work package 3.7) of the EU-funded INTARESE project. The contents were obtained from [http://www.integrated-assessment.eu/resource_centre/changing_ambient_uvr_and_future_melanoma_and_non_melanoma_skin_cancer_london_rome_an IEHIAS toolbox].
+
:''The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the [[Talk:IEHIAS|IEHIAS]]-project.
 
 
  
 
The potential environmental health impacts of waste management of municipal solid waste (MSW) are poorly understood, especially when the different aspects of the full chain process (waste production, collection, transport, recycling, treatment, disposal) are taken into consideration.
 
The potential environmental health impacts of waste management of municipal solid waste (MSW) are poorly understood, especially when the different aspects of the full chain process (waste production, collection, transport, recycling, treatment, disposal) are taken into consideration.
  
 +
To evaluate these impacts, a prognostic assessment was carried out in Lazio (a region in Central Italy with about 5.5 million inhabitants including Rome).  The assessment compared two future waste management scenarios, reflecting different sustainable strategies, with a business-as-usual scenario.  Effects of exposures to airborne pollutants (particles, nitrogen dioxide, dioxins, bioaerosols, biogas, odours and occupational accidents) were considered, from three main activities: waste transport, landfill sites, mechanical and biological treatment (MBT) and incineration.  Health effects associated with mortality (mainly from cardiovascular and respiratory causes), adult cancers, congenital malformations, respiratory symptoms, odour annoyance and physical injuries were assessed, and aggregated into an overall measure of the disease burden (in disease-adjusted life years). 
  
To evaluate these impacts, a prognostic assessment was carried out in Lazio (a region in Central Italy with about 5.5 million inhabitants including Rome).  The assessment compared two future waste management scenarios, reflecting different sustainable strategies, with a business-as-usual scenario.  Effects of exposures to airborne pollutants (particles, nitrogen dioxide, dioxins, bioaerosols, biogas, oodours and occupational accidents) were conmsidered, from three main activities: waste transport, landfill sites, mechanical and biological treatment (MBT) and incineration.  Health effects associated with mortality (mainly from cardiovascular and respiratory causes), adult cancers, congenital malformations, respiratory symptoms, odour annoyance and physical injuries were assessed, and aggregated into an overall measure of the disease burden (in disease-adjusted life years). 
+
Results showed an overall moderate impact on health.  The most important heath impacts were due to occupational accidents related to the collection, loading and transport of waste. Transport of waste (often done using highly polluting trucks) is also an important (and often neglected) cause of exposure to air pollution.  Impacts from landfills and and incinerators is limited due to the strict legislation on emissions, but both landfills and mechanical-biological treatment plants were responsible for a considerable impact in the form of respiratory symptoms and odour annoyance.  The main opportunity to reduce health impacts in the future would be through policies that encourage waste reduction, recycling, clean transport, composting and waste treatment before the final destination.  
 
 
 
 
Results showed an overall moderate impact on health.  The most important heath impacts were due to occupational accidents related to the
 
 
 
 
 
collection, loading and transport of waste. Transport of waste (often done using highly polluting trucks) is also an important (and often neglected) cause of exposure to air pollution.  Impacts from landfills and and incinerators is limited due to the strict legislation on emissions, but both landfills and mechanical-biological treatment plants were responsible for a considerable impact in the form of respiratory symptoms and odour annoyance.  The main opportunity to reduce health impacts in the future would be through policies that encourage waste reduction, recycling, clean transport, composting and waste treatment before the final destination.  
 
 
 
 
 
The findings also suggest an important equity issue, evidenced by the differential distribution of impacts by social group, espicially for people living close to management plants. The same applies to occupational injuries among workers.  These equity issues were not resolved even by the most radical Green strategy.  More attention to equity issues is therefore needed in waste management planning and operation.
 
 
 
==References==
 
 
 
<references/>
 
  
==Related files==
+
The findings also suggest an important equity issue, evidenced by the differential distribution of impacts by social group, especially for people living close to management plants. The same applies to occupational injuries among workers.  These equity issues were not resolved even by the most radical Green strategy.  More attention to equity issues is therefore needed in waste management planning and operation.
  
{{mfiles}}
+
==See also==
  
{{eracedu}}
+
*[[File:iehias_waste_assessment_final_report.pdf]]

Revision as of 11:58, 13 August 2014

The text on this page is taken from an equivalent page of the IEHIAS-project.

The potential environmental health impacts of waste management of municipal solid waste (MSW) are poorly understood, especially when the different aspects of the full chain process (waste production, collection, transport, recycling, treatment, disposal) are taken into consideration.

To evaluate these impacts, a prognostic assessment was carried out in Lazio (a region in Central Italy with about 5.5 million inhabitants including Rome). The assessment compared two future waste management scenarios, reflecting different sustainable strategies, with a business-as-usual scenario. Effects of exposures to airborne pollutants (particles, nitrogen dioxide, dioxins, bioaerosols, biogas, odours and occupational accidents) were considered, from three main activities: waste transport, landfill sites, mechanical and biological treatment (MBT) and incineration. Health effects associated with mortality (mainly from cardiovascular and respiratory causes), adult cancers, congenital malformations, respiratory symptoms, odour annoyance and physical injuries were assessed, and aggregated into an overall measure of the disease burden (in disease-adjusted life years).

Results showed an overall moderate impact on health. The most important heath impacts were due to occupational accidents related to the collection, loading and transport of waste. Transport of waste (often done using highly polluting trucks) is also an important (and often neglected) cause of exposure to air pollution. Impacts from landfills and and incinerators is limited due to the strict legislation on emissions, but both landfills and mechanical-biological treatment plants were responsible for a considerable impact in the form of respiratory symptoms and odour annoyance. The main opportunity to reduce health impacts in the future would be through policies that encourage waste reduction, recycling, clean transport, composting and waste treatment before the final destination.

The findings also suggest an important equity issue, evidenced by the differential distribution of impacts by social group, especially for people living close to management plants. The same applies to occupational injuries among workers. These equity issues were not resolved even by the most radical Green strategy. More attention to equity issues is therefore needed in waste management planning and operation.

See also