Difference between revisions of "Central product classification"

From Opasnet
Jump to: navigation, search
(code and ovariables updated)
(Answer)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{attack|#|Something wrong with the first-level codes (there is a leading zero although should not be). This was corrected, but is there more problems with the data?|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 23:05, 27 December 2013 (EET)}}
 
{{attack|#|Something wrong with the first-level codes (there is a leading zero although should not be). This was corrected, but is there more problems with the data?|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 23:05, 27 December 2013 (EET)}}
  
<rcode name="answer" embed=1>
+
<rcode name="answer" label="Show classification levels 1-2" embed=1>
 
library(OpasnetUtils)
 
library(OpasnetUtils)
  
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
oprint(head(CPC@output))
 
oprint(head(CPC@output))
 +
 +
</rcode>
 +
 +
 +
<rcode name="subclasses" label="Show lower classification levels" embed=1 variables="
 +
name:class|description:Which class do you want to see in detail?|type:text|default:011
 +
">
 +
library(OpasnetUtils)
 +
 +
objects.latest("Op_en5914", code_name = "initiate")
 +
 +
CPC <- EvalOutput(CPC)
 +
 +
oprint(CPC@output[regexpr(class, CPC@output$CPC.code) == 1 , ])
  
 
</rcode>
 
</rcode>

Revision as of 09:37, 28 December 2013



Question

What is a good classification system for products?

Answer

⇤--#: . Something wrong with the first-level codes (there is a leading zero although should not be). This was corrected, but is there more problems with the data? --Jouni (talk) 23:05, 27 December 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

+ Show code


Which class do you want to see in detail?:

+ Show code

Rationale

UN CPC version 2 seems to be an optimal choice. [1] [2]

Dependencies

Calculations

+ Show code

See also

Keywords

References


Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>